Demand for Build America Bonds (WSJ)

Investors Push to Extend BABs By ANDREW EDWARDS

The Build America Bond program isn't set to expire until the end of 2010, but portfolio managers and other investors in this new class of taxable municipal securities already are arguing to extend it. The reason: The bonds, known as BABs, have done their job. They have helped states, cities and other local government entities tap new capital markets and lower financing costs.

The credit crisis obliterated much of the demand for municipal debt. Money-market funds lost their appetite for variable-rate bonds, and funds that had borrowed heavily to invest in munis disappeared almost entirely.

Municipalities were forced to delay issuing new debt, or to offer unheard-of rates to attract enough individual investors to fund projects. BABs were meant to change that, and they did: New investors have come to the table and tens of billions of dollars in BABs have been issued.

"BABs are a much better foundation for the muni market," said Peter Coffin, president of Breckinridge Capital Advisors, which has $11 billion in municipal bonds under management. "It's a deeper source of demand."

The question is whether they are worth the long-term cost.

The most popular form of BABs pay higher interest rates than tax-exempt muni bonds and recoup 35% of the interest charge from the federal government. So, if a public university sells BABs with an interest rate of 5%, the university ends up paying only 3.25%, with Uncle Sam's subsidy effectively picking up the difference.

This makes BABs attractive to municipalities, which end up with an actual cost of capital even lower than on traditional tax-free muni bonds. The triple-A rated Virginia College Building Authority recently issued tax-free bonds due in 2027 at a par yield of 4.25%, said Ben Landers, head of taxable municipal-bond sales and trading at investment bank Morgan Keegan in Memphis, Tenn. Similar Virginia transportation BABs yield 5.72%, he said, but the actual cost to the state is 3.71%.

"If you're building something it makes sense to go BABs," Mr. Landers said.

However, that subsidy adds up. Assume that BABs yield an average of 5.95%, the average yield on Wells Fargo & Co.'s BAB index at the beginning of November, and that $48.3 billion of BABs have been issued this year. That means, year to date, the federal government has been put on the hook for $1 billion in yearly interest payments, a number that is only going to increase.

Advocates of BABs said that much of that figure is likely to come back in the form of federal taxes. They said these bonds potentially could end up costing the government less than the tax-free alternative if, and it is a big if, the taxable securities don't end up largely overseas or in the hands of nonprofit groups, pension funds and other institutions that aren't taxable to begin with.

Right now, those institutions shun lower-yielding munis because they don't benefit from the tax exemption on interest. They also are the major source of new demand for BABs.

"We really don't have a group of investor that can't buy BABs," Mr. Landers said. "For tax-free bonds, it's a very finite group of people."

BAB supporters argue that it is a more-efficient subsidy. The increased demand eventually will drive down yields, and the savings will be passed on to taxpayers. This is in contrast to the tax-free bonds, where the full benefits, they said, were never priced in.

Public advocates worry that the increased ease in raising capital could be an invitation to spend the easy money less wisely.

"It's an awful lot of money that's being put into the market without more transparency," said Michael Lakosky, at New York University's Institute for Public Knowledge.

Write to Andrew Edwards at andrew.edwards@dowjones.com

Slow & Steady Starting to Look Good - Municipal Bonds (from NY Times)

May 21, 2009
More Investors, Chastened by Stock Losses, Settle for Municipal Bonds
By PAUL SULLIVAN
THE historic lure of most municipal bonds has been their tax-free returns. But the recession and the rash of corporate troubles have widened their appeal to investors wary of the stock market who want to settle for a steady if unspectacular return.

Municipal bonds are still the terrain of high earners, who like their safety and higher tax-adjusted return than Treasury bonds. But increasingly average retail investors have been buying them to fill out their bond allocations. “Our average account has increased their asset allocation in fixed income to 52 percent and most of that is in munis,” said Robert Everett, director of fixed income at the Boston Private Bank and Trust Company. He said that was an increase of 15 percentage points from last year.

Even though the major stock markets have risen in the last month, uncertainty about the rally abounds. Suddenly, the return on a municipal bond of 6 to 7 percent, including the tax exemption, seems great.

The other draw has been safety. Historically, the default rate on investment-grade munis is less than a quarter of a percent, compared with almost 2 percent for corporate bonds. And the difference in yield between United States Treasuries and munis has recently been as much as 2.5 percent.

Given the pressure on city and state coffers, the default rate is likely to rise closer to 1 percent. But that is far lower than the yields on munis suggests, said George Strickland, a managing director at Thornburg Investment Management of Santa Fe, N.M. “The market thinks 20 percent of investment grade issuers will default in the next 10 years,” he said. “The major muni issuers are doing well.”

Being selective with munis is key. The first risk investors need to understand is the difference between general obligation and revenue bonds. General obligation bonds are sold to finance the daily operations of a municipality. Legally, that entity is obligated to do whatever it needs — from cutting services to raising taxes — to make its bond payments.

A revenue bond is sold to finance particular projects like hospitals, utilities and stadiums. The receipts from such projects are used to make the bond payments, and many investors have started to wonder how these will hold up.
“Stay away from revenue bonds, backed by projects like a parking lot at a university,” warned Gregg S. Fisher, chief investment officer of Gerstein Fisher, an investment advisory firm in New York. “If cars stop showing up, then you could have trouble getting your money.”

Hospital bonds also need to be evaluated carefully. “Community hospitals with A and BBB ratings are feeling the pinch because people without insurance go to them and can’t pay,” said Ronald J. Sanchez, director of fixed income strategies at Fiduciary Trust, a unit of Franklin Templeton Investments. “You need to avoid certain segments with greater risk.”

This points to another issue: liquidity. Roughly $360 billion of new bonds are sold annually. New York and California are the benchmark issuers and their bonds are traded often. But there are scores of municipalities that sell bonds that buyers may have to hold for their duration because of illiquid markets.

Munis are traded in an over-the-counter fashion, which means finding a price quote, let alone a buyer, can be difficult at times. Although small investors make up a good part of this market, the Securities and Exchange Commission has no role in its regulation.

But for those aware of the risk, there are investing opportunities. During the first quarter, few municipalities sold bonds because they were waiting to see what the stimulus plan would bring them. Now, cities and states are making up for lost time.

Several portfolio managers advise that shorter-dated munis are safer. “The longer the duration the more volatility,” said Mr. Strickland, who likes the two- to three-year range.

Diversification is also being pushed for munis. Historically investors have concentrated on bonds from their state to get the full tax deduction. But owning bonds from other states could give them a greater return, as in the case of California, where a fiscal crisis has pushed up yields.

The recession has brought about new securities, known as Build America Bonds, to help ailing municipalities raise money. They allow municipalities to sell taxable bonds for capital projects while receiving a rebate from the federal government for a portion of their borrowing costs. The program is meant to attract institutional investors who typically do not buy munis. But they could also suit a retail investor who wants to put them in a taxable retirement account.

MARKETWATCH California BABS Build America Bonds

California sells $6.85 bln in infrastructure bonds

By Laura Mandaro
Last update: 2:12 p.m. EDT April 22, 2009
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- California sold $6.85 billion in general obligation bonds Wednesday, including $5.23 billion in federally subsidized Build America Bonds, its state treasurer's office said Wednesday. The bond sale was expanded from original plans of about $3 billion, and the Build America portion is the largest under that federal program to date. All of the bonds in the deal were taxable, a change from most municipal issues. The U.S. is subsidizing interest payments on the Build America Bonds to help states sell taxable infrastructure bonds to a different group of investors without paying more interest. With the subsidy, the Build America Bonds carry a rate of 4.83%. All are in 25-year and 30-year maturities.