Last Minute Tax Savings (WSJ)

The 10 Money Moves to Consider Before 2010 Expires Did You Give Holiday Gifts to Co-Workers? You Might Be in Luck on Taxes.

By JENNIFER OPENSHAW

New Year's Eve is almost here, but don't let that stop you from making some important money moves now, before Dec. 31, so you can reap the benefits in 2011.

Michael Casey says that with New Year's Eve almost here, you will want to consider these important money moves before year end to reap benefits in 2011.
.1) Take investment losses. The end of the year is a great time to review your portfolio and your asset allocation. If you have a dog of a stock or mutual fund that you want to eliminate, it is often a good idea to do it by Dec. 31.

The losses you take can offset the gains you have realized on other stocks or funds and help reduce your tax bill.

For example, say you sold your Apple stock and made $10,000. But you have a poor-performing fund relative to other options that, if you sold it, would result in a $5,000 loss. When taken together, the losses from selling leave you with a net taxable gain of $5,000, far less than had you not sold the investment dog.

2) Max-out your retirement accounts. Many companies have reinstated their 401(k) matching contribution after wiping it out during the recession. But even if not, your 401(k) is still one of your top savings vehicles, and you should fund it as much as possible by year-end. The maximum contribution in 2010 is $16,500 plus $5,500 for those 50 and older.

3) Check your paycheck withholding. The new tax law means your take-home pay next year likely will be higher, thanks to lower Social Security taxes, which for most workers will be cut to 4.2%, from 6.2% now.

So, make sure you aren't having too much or too little withheld. Too much means Uncle Sam is earning interest on your money (though you will get a refund) and too little means you will have a tax bill.

While it is always a good idea to review your withholding annually, the new changes make it even more important. You should also review your withholding if you are an individual or couple with multiple jobs, are having children, getting married, getting divorced or buying a home, or are someone who typically winds up with a large refund at the end of the year.

4) Deduct holiday gifts up to $25 for business. Did you give any holiday gifts to co-workers, vendors, or prospective customers or partners? If so, you will want to keep those receipts since you will be able to deduct up to $25 for such gifts.

This means the $25 for those gourmet chocolate pretzels or toward tickets to the theater would actually run you about $17 out-of-pocket, depending on your tax bracket.
Also, you will want to include anything deductible for your holiday party so long as it had a business purpose.

5) Give to a relative and reduce your tax bill. We have written before about all the ways grandparents or simply those who have some extra wealth can help others, especially someone trying to close the college funding gap.

Give the gift of education or something else worthwhile while you are alive and you will not only reduce your taxable estate, but you will enjoy seeing it put to use.

You can give up to $13,000 a year to someone if you are single ($26,000 if married) without facing gift taxes. If you contribute to a "529" college-savings plan, however, you can front-load your gifting and give up to five times that amount in one year—that is $130,000 if you are a couple—without facing a gift tax. Nice.

6) Donate to a charity. 'Tis the season to give, and if you have been one of the lucky ones who did better financially than you expected, maybe you are up for sharing more of it. You can give cash or stock to a charity, but what's better?

If the stock is worth more than you bought it for, you are usually better off donating it to charity instead of selling it. That allows you to avoid the capital-gains tax on the profit. For example, say you bought 100 shares of a stock at $10 per share and they are now worth $30 per share.

If you donate the stock to charity, you won't have to pay the capital-gains tax on the $2,000 in profit. If you have had the stock for at least a year, you will also be able to deduct the fair-market value of it on your taxes, as long as you itemize.

On the flip side, if the value of the stock is less than you bought it for, you will probably want to cash it first so you can deduct the loss.

Of course, donating money is usually deductible (as long as you itemize). And if you are donating your services, remember that only mileage, not your time, is deductible.

7) Make an estimated tax payment early. If you didn't pay enough to the federal government last year, you may face an even bigger tax bill come April 15. For instance, maybe you didn't have enough taxes withheld from your paycheck or you made a chunk of money on an investment. If you pay estimated taxes, consider paying by Dec. 31.

8) Pay January's mortgage in December. Similarly, making a mortgage payment early will increase your mortgage deduction for 2010.

Perhaps all the talk about possibly eliminating this valuable deduction might spur you to move on this one.

9) Enroll in your employer's flexible-spending account. These accounts allow you to sock away up to $5,000 (the maximum amount varies by employer) on a pretax basis, much like a 401(k), to cover out-of-pocket health-care costs. Also, find out whether your employer offers a similar benefit for child-care expenses.

Open enrollment is typically the only time to make changes to your plan and that is usually in November. However, you may be able to make changes if you have experienced a "qualifying life event," such as a marriage or divorce, a new child, a change in your employment or you go on family medical leave.

10) Contribute to your IRA. While you have until April 15 to fund your IRA, whether a Roth or traditional, getting it done before then will leave you with one less thing to worry about.

At a minimum, get the paperwork done to open an account if you don't have one already. The maximum you can contribute is $5,000 and an additional $1,000 for over-50 retirement savers for a total of $6,000. And don't forget your nonworking spouse—you can save for him or her, too.

Copyright 2010 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008

What is going on with municipal bonds? The End of BABs (Build America Bonds) (from WSJ)

Muni Bonds Continue to Tumble
A Rush to Sell Build America Bonds Before They Are Gone.

By Romy Varghese and Kelly Nolan
Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

Prices of municipal bonds fell sharply for the second day Tuesday, driving yields on long-term bonds to the highest points in more than 18 months, as investors worried about the impact of the end of a federally subsidized borrowing program.

The yield on a closely watched index of high-grade, tax-exempt 30-year muni bonds rose to 4.84%, its highest level since March 2009, according to Thomson Reuters Municipal Market Data. The yield on 10-year bonds climbed to 3.24%, the highest since June 2009. Yields move inversely to prices.

.The market took a hit Monday as well, as the expiration of the Build America Bond program by the end of the year looked increasingly likely.

An extension of the program, which provides a 35% interest-rate subsidy from the federal government on taxable bonds issued by municipalities, on Monday wasn't included in legislation introduced in the U.S. Senate that continues Bush-era tax cuts.

Since the government started the BAB program in April 2009 as part of its economic stimulus, more than $165 billion of these bonds have been sold, accounting for about 22% of all new municipal debt, according to data from the U.S. Treasury Department.

Many municipal-bond market participants expect that, without BABs, state and local governments will issue more tax-exempt bonds next year and may overwhelm investor demand for that debt. This would force states and cities to raise their rates to attract buyers.

About $100 billion in long-term tax-exempt bonds would return to the market next year, estimated Robert Nelson, managing analyst at Municipal Market Data.

"With the loss of leveraged buyers of municipal bonds in 2008, there has been a dearth of demand for long maturity munis--this is where BABs came in and diverted this issuance to the taxable market," Nelson said. "Now without BABs the market is left to deal with the same supply/demand imbalance that plagued munis in 2008 and early 2009."

He added that long-term yields have generally returned to the same level seen at the outset of the Build America Bond program last year.

States with some of the lowest credit ratings have been especially battered by the recent muni-market turmoil.

The spreads on Illinois 10-year maturity general obligation bonds grew from 1.60 to 1.90 percentage points from Nov. 1 through Monday above a benchmark triple-A bond with the same maturity, according to Municipal Market Data.

Spreads on California general obligation bonds increased from 0.97 to 1.30 percentage points over the same time frame.

Meanwhile, municipal borrowers are plowing into the market with BAB deals in the last few market days of the year.

"We are hitting the market as quickly as we can because it's only going to get worse," said Harold Downs, treasurer of the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago.

Because of the market conditions, the water district is shrinking the size of its bond sale this week from $500 million to $280 million, he said. Most of the offering is BABs.

The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California is planning to sell $250 million in BABs this week, moving up part of a $450 million deal it had originally scheduled for the spring, said Brian Thomas, the water district's assistant general manager and chief financial officer.

"I think the market is still favorable if you look back over the last 10 years, but if you look compared to a month ago, it's a much more difficult market," Mr. Thomas said.

Higher yields may ultimately help stabilize the market by attracting buyers, said Dan Solender, director of municipal bond management at investment firm Lord Abbett in Jersey City.

And amid the volatility, some analysts are encouraging investors to buy municipal bonds from creditworthy issuers. Munis are now offering higher yields than U.S. Treasurys of comparable duration, which is the inverse of the usual relationship, noted Dan Loughran, senior portfolio manager at OppenheimerFunds. "Prices in the municipal bond market may continue to be volatile in the near term, but we believe relief is likely waiting in the wings once the New Year gets underway," he wrote in a report.

—Jeannette Neumann contributed to this article.
-By Romy Varghese, Dow Jones Newswires; 215-656-8263; romy.varghese@dowjones.com

Social Security Payback Loophole Eliminated

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Mark Lassiter, Press Officer For Immediate Release

News Release

SOCIAL SECURITY SSA Press Office 440 Altmeyer Building 6401 Security Blvd. Baltimore, MD 21235 410-965-8904 FAX 410-966-9973

Social Security Publishes New Rule Revising Withdrawal Policy Rule Also Limits Voluntary Suspension to Prospective Months

The Social Security Administration today published final rules, effective immediately, that limit the time period for beneficiaries to withdraw an application for retirement benefits to within 12 months of the first month of entitlement and to one withdrawal per lifetime. In addition, beneficiaries entitled to retirement benefits may voluntarily suspend benefits only for the months beginning after the month in which the request is made. The agency is changing its withdrawal policy because recent media articles have promoted the use of the current policy as a means for retired beneficiaries to acquire an "interest-free loan." However, this "free loan" costs the Social Security Trust Fund the use of money during the period the beneficiary is receiving benefits with the intent of later withdrawing the application and the interest earned on these funds. The processing of these withdrawal applications is also a poor use of the agency’s limited administrative resources in a time of fiscal austerity -- resources that could be better used to serve the millions of Americans who need Social Security’s services. Although the new rules are effective immediately, the agency is providing for a 60-day public comment period. The agency will consider any relevant comments received and publish another final rule to respond to comments and to make any appropriate changes to the rule.

Social Security recommends that comments be submitted via the Internet. To view the new rule or to comment, visit the Federal eRulemaking portal at www.regulations.gov and use the Search function to find docket number SSA-2009-0073. ###

Best and Worst Places to Retire (Marketwatch)

Dec. 9, 2010, 3:03 p.m. EST

The 10 worst states for retirees
Commentary: Taxes, weather take glitter off golden years
By Robert Powell, MarketWatch
BOSTON (MarketWatch) — Plenty of folks are aware of the best states for retirees. But what are the 10 worst states in which to spend your golden years?

People of Illinois, California, New York, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Ohio, Wisconsin, Massachusetts, Connecticut and Nevada — you probably already know the answer.

The list, with Illinois leading the pack, comes from website TopRetirements.com. According to John Brady, president of TopRetirements.com, the 10 states earn this dubious distinction largely because of three factors: fiscal health, taxation, climate. See the worst-state rankings at TopRetirements.com.

Worst retirement states Illinois and California top the list of the worst states to retire to, according to TopRetirements.com. As for fiscal health, six of the 10 worst states for retirees on TopRetirements.com’s list were among those just identified by a Pew Center for States report as being in “fiscal peril.”

The report, "Beyond California: States in Fiscal Peril," showed that “some of the same pressures that have pushed California toward economic disaster are wreaking havoc in a number of other states, with potentially damaging consequences for the entire country.”

Arizona, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island and Wisconsin joined California as the 10 most troubled states, according to Pew’s analysis.

Of note, TopRetirements.com’s Brady suggested that retirees and would-be retirees might want to avoid states in fiscal peril because these locales might be expected to face decreasing services and increasing taxation.

Topping his website's list, Illinois’s fiscal health could be the worst of any state, observed Brady. “It even borrowed money to fund its pension obligations,” he said. As for California, he said the Golden State — though it does have a warm climate — is expensive and its finances are in disarray. What’s more, he added, it has paid some bills with vouchers.

New York wasn’t mentioned as being in fiscal trouble by the Pew Center, but it does have “very high taxes, including property taxes.” In fact, Brady said New York has the second-highest tax burden and fifth-highest per capita property taxes. Plus, he said, the Empire State has a “dysfunctional state legislature.” As if that wasn’t bad enough, it’s terrifically expensive to live in New York. The only benefit to living in New York, he said, is that pensions are exempt from income tax.

As for Rhode Island, Brady said it’s probably the worst-off state in the Northeast from a financial viewpoint. It also has high taxes, though he noted that the state does boast some great places to live.

New Jersey, according to Brady’s analysis, has the highest property taxes in the U.S., as well as the highest total tax burden of any state, as reported in a 2008 Tax Foundation report. Plus, New Jersey has serious pension-funding issues, Brady noted. States with the greatest tax burdens after New Jersey were New York, Connecticut, Maryland, Hawaii, California, Ohio, Vermont, Wisconsin and Rhode Island, joined by the District of Columbia.

According to Brady, Ohio has high taxes and high unemployment (9.9% in October). Plus, it has cold winters.
Of the 40 largest cities in the United States, Milwaukee has the coldest winter weather, based on normal daily temperatures, according to Current Results, a website that tracks weather trends. The lakeside Wisconsin city’s daily winter mean temperature is 24.1 degrees Fahrenheit. But fellow Great Lakes metropolis Cleveland is the fourth-coldest U.S. city, with a daily winter mean temperature that’s not much higher at 28.4 degrees Fahrenheit.

Wisconsin, as noted, is doubly cursed in these rankings as a high-tax state with cold weather. Plus, it has high property taxes. The only good news, at least for those to whom it applies, is that the Badger State doesn’t tax military pensions.

In a related survey, USAA and Military.com announced this week that Waco, Texas, tops the first-ever "Best Places for Military Retirement" list. In its report, USAA and Military.com focused on U.S. communities that offer “a high quality of life and help maximize military retiree benefits as service members manage their ‘first retirement’ from the armed forces and begin planning their ‘second retirement’ from civilian life.” Other places on that list included, in order, Oklahoma City; Austin, Texas; College Station, Texas; Harrisburg, Pa.; San Angelo, Texas; Madison, Wis.; Pittsburgh; New Orleans; and Syracuse, N.Y.

New England had two other states on Brady’s list of worst places for retirees: Massachusetts, which has high taxes including high property taxes and a very high cost of living, and Connecticut, which has the third-highest tax burden of any state as well as high property taxes. “It has some terrific places to live, but the cost of living is very high,” he said of Connecticut. What’s worse, the Nutmeg State taxes Social Security.

States with the highest cost of living in the third quarter of 2010 were, in order, Hawaii, Alaska, California, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Maryland, Vermont and New Hampshire, according to a Missouri Economic Research and Information Center analysis. The District of Columbia also makes the list. Read the analysis, which noted among other things that Missouri had the eighth-lowest cost of living in the U.S.

Ironically, the 10th-worst place to retire is the one state where it’s easy to find a cheap place to live: Nevada. As many know, Nevada is presently the home-foreclosure capital of the world. In fact, the Silver State continues to lead the nation in terms of foreclosure filings per household, with one filing for every 79 homes, according to RealtyTrac. Yes, the state is having financial problems, but the good news for retirees living there or contemplating a move there is that it doesn’t have an income tax — at least not yet.

Of course, not everyone is smitten with Nevada as a place to retire. Money-Rates.com published in September its list of the 10 worst states for retirees. That site, which examined such factors as crime rates, climate, longevity and economic conditions, including taxes, job opportunities and cost of living, found the worst states for retirees were, in order, Nevada, Michigan, Alaska, South Carolina, Maryland, Tennessee, Ohio, North Carolina, Missouri and Arkansas.

Does any of this mean you shouldn’t retire to these poorly ranked states? According to Brady, the answer is no. “Every individual has to consider his or her own criteria for selecting a list of the worst or best states to retire,” he said. “The best way to start your individual list of best or worst states is to rank, or at least think about, your most important criteria.”

In his study, Brady focused mostly on fiscal health, taxation and climate. But according to Brady, the full list of factors to consider when searching for a state in which to retire includes: taxes; climate and topography; crime; fiscal health of the state; recreation; transportation; health care; cost of living, including housing; education, including college; cultural resources; susceptibility to natural disasters; proximity to friends and family; and fitting in socially, politically and religiously. And of those, taxes might be the most important. Retirees are affected in different ways by taxes, he said. For instance, the taxation of pensions and Social Security might be better or worse in different states. Ditto, sales taxes.

Property taxes can vary widely, as well. For instance, Brady said, property tax can be one of the biggest bills for retirees and it’s a category of taxation that’s not progressive. You might not have any income, but you will still get taxed on the full value of your house, he said. Of note, some states do have programs to help seniors control their property taxes. Inheritance and estate taxes are also to be considered, though he said such taxes might be viewed as the tax tail wagging the state-of-residence dog.

Choosing the best state in which to retire depends on many individual factors, and in truth, said Brady, “For any two people, the 10-worst-states-for-retirees list might be a good list for one person, but not for [the other].”

Robert Powell is editor of Retirement Weekly, published by MarketWatch