The Best Annuities (Barrons)

MAY 28, 2012 Top 50 Annuities
By KAREN HUBE | MORE ARTICLES BY AUTHOR

Americans are eager to lock in steady retirement income. We pick the best annuities from a dizzying array of choices.

Top 50 Annuities
By KAREN HUBE | MORE ARTICLES BY AUTHOR



When wealth manager Peter D'Arruda talks about the "old days" for annuities, he isn't talking about the Roman Empire, where these income-generating insurance products were invented and payments were calculated with an abacus. He's talking about last year, when guaranteed payouts and benefits on all kinds of annuities were far more generous. For example, he helped a 45-year-old investor find a fixed index annuity with guaranteed annual appreciation of 8.2% for 30 years and no risk to principal.

Today an investor that age likely wouldn't even qualify for an index annuity with income guarantees. "And that rate? It doesn't exist anymore," says D'Arruda, president of Capital Financial in Cary, N.C. "A lot has changed. There are still some good products out there, but it's hard to find the whipped cream on the sundae."


Annuities, which are insurance contracts, come in many shapes and sizes. They include fixed-rate, in which the principal compounds at a pre-set rate; variable, in which the principal appreciates based on the performance of an underlying mix of stocks and bonds; deferred, which require an upfront investment with payouts down the road, and immediate, which turn a lump sum, upon purchase, into guaranteed monthly payments for life. One attractive feature of annuities is that, as with most individual retirement accounts, or IRAs, balances grow tax-deferred until withdrawals begin. Even more important these days, annuities help remove investors' worst fears: losing principal and running out of money in retirement.

Variable annuities also resemble an IRA because withdrawals can begin after you turn 59½. But there the similarity ends. Given a dizzying number of features and restrictions, contracts for some annuities -- variable and otherwise -- can run 300 pages or more. And because each comes with its own small twists, these products can be very difficult to compare.

LOW BOND YIELDS and a sagging stock market have forced big insurers to re-evaluate their annuities strategies in recent years, and some major providers, including Hartford Financial (ticker: HIG), John Hancock, ING (ING), Genworth Financial (GNW) and Sun Life Financial (SLF), have opted to exit the business or scale back. Most of the remaining companies have cut back benefits significantly on new contracts.

"We've seen investment options in variable annuities diminished, guarantees brought down substantially and fees going up," says Nigel Dally, an analyst at Morgan Stanley. "Protracted low interest rates and high volatility in the stock market have made it far more expensive for annuity companies to support their products."

For investors, however, all is not lost. There are still competitive products that provide significant assurances for a reasonable price. Barron's has combed through hundreds of annuities to come up with a list of 50 best-in-class investments.

The tables below list highly competitive contracts in five annuity categories: deferred variable, fixed index, fixed deferred, immediate, and longevity insurance, which is geared toward 55-to 65-year old investors who won't begin collecting until they turn 80 or 85.






."Longevity insurance removes the big challenge in retirement planning: knowing when you're going to die," says Adam Rolewicz, director of Opus Advisory Group in Purchase, N.Y. "Knowing you'll have an income at a later age makes it easier to plan how to invest the rest of your money."

WHILE LOW INTEREST RATES have impacted all types of annuities, the category that has been hit the hardest is also the biggest: variable annuities. Of the $231.1 billion investors poured into annuities last year, 67% went into variable annuities, according to the Insured Retirement Institute.

Since the stock market crash of 2008, insurance companies have tried to one-up each other with increasingly generous living-benefit riders, guaranteeing a withdrawal rate for life, even if you live to 100 and the assets in your account are depleted. Demand for such products has been strong: Almost nine out of 10 variable annuities sold in 2011 had such a rider.

But many providers apparently promised more than they could afford. "Insurers try to cover the risk of offering generous lifetime guarantees by buying Treasuries and long-term swaps, but this doesn't work well when interest rates are so low," says Tamiko Toland, managing director at Strategic Insights, a market-research firm.

To compensate, annual withdrawal guarantees have been reduced -- to around 4.5% for a 65-year-old from 6% a year ago. And the annual costs for these add-ons have gone up about 25%, to more than 1% of assets.

Another way many insurance companies, including MetLife (MET), RiverSource and AXA Equitable, are trying to bring down the cost of operating variable annuities is by restricting investment options. Lincoln National (LNC), one of the country's highest-rated insurers, added five asset allocation models to its regular line-up of mutual fund investment options in its American Legacy and ChoicePlus variable annuities, and investors are given incentives to select them. For example, those who choose an asset allocation model may get a 5% lifetime withdrawal rate at age 60 instead of 4% for investors who choose to invest among the mutual funds. "This reduces the cost of hedging…and allows us to offer a sustainable product," says Brian Kroll, Lincoln's head of annuity solutions.

Investors slowly may be catching on to these changes. While variable-annuity sales rose 12% last year, to $155.5 billion -- the highest level since the 2007 peak of $183 billion -- they slumped 7% in the first quarter of 2012.

If there is a positive spin for investors from the recent shake-out in the variable- annuity market, it's that some of the stronger companies, including Jackson National, Ohio National, Guardian, AXA Equitable, Nationwide and Pacific Life, are likely to keep coming out with competitive and unique products to set themselves apart from their peers, says Scott DeMonte, co-owner of VA Edge, an annuity-oriented consulting firm.


DESPITE VARIABLE ANNUITIES' overwhelming popularity, some advisors say most variable annuities should be avoided because they are too expensive. The average variable annuity charges a 1.34% fee for insurance and administrative expenses on top of fees for the underlying investment, which average almost 1%. All in, that's an average of almost 2.3%, compared with 1.2% for the average mutual fund, according to Morningstar.

Most annuities also have surrender charges, or fees for withdrawing your money. Fees typically begin at 7% or 8% in the first two years after purchase, and decline each year thereafter before expiring after seven to nine years.

Fixed index annuities, a variation on fixed annuities, have been gaining attention lately. Most of the portfolio grows at a fixed rate, but a variable component is pegged to an index, typically the S&P 500.

While fixed annuities usually beat the rate you would get on a certificate of deposit or a money-market account, their rates have been only between 1.5% and 2.5% these days. Investors have been choosing fixed index annuities as a better-paying alternative. Sales of indexed annuities rose 14% in the first quarter of this year, the only annuity category whose numbers grew.



With these hybrids, your money is invested in investment-grade bonds and Treasuries. The insurer uses the interest generated by these investments to buy options on an index. If those options pay off, investors get the appreciation of the index–although participation typically is capped at around 6%, meaning that if the stock market goes up 10% or 20%, you earn 6%. In exchange, if the market declines, you are guaranteed to have no negative return. The account value usually is reset periodically to reflect and guarantee appreciation.

A fresh and popular wrinkle in these indexed annuities is a so-called income rider, which guarantees investors a minimum annual payment for life at various ages. If you begin withdrawals at 65, for example, your payment will be lower than if you begin at 66 (see the accompanying tables).

In these and other fixed annuities, the pricing is built into the payout rates, so the only sound way to size them up is by comparing what you ultimately pocket if you go with one contract over another.

THE MOST BARE-BONES KIND OF ANNUITY is an immediate annuity, and it is the type most favored by financial advisors to address investors' concerns about outliving their money. Quite simply, you give an insurance company a lump sum, and based on formulas that crunch life-expectancy data, interest rates, insurance fees, and other factors, the insurer guarantees you a certain income, usually for life.

For example, a healthy 65-year-old woman who buys an immediate annuity with $300,000 can expect to get a monthly income stream, starting right away, of about $1,600, or $19,200 annually, no matter how long she lives. By age 88, her life expectancy, she will have been paid out $441,600.

If you die before your principal is paid out, the insurance company keeps your assets. But there are a number of variations on this simple annuity to appeal to investor concerns. For example, you can arrange the annuity to cover the lives of both spouses, adjust for inflation, or be guaranteed to pay for a certain period even if you die within that period.

The costs of guarantees are reflected in the payout. The table "Best in Class" shows how payments can vary.

The variation that's best for you comes down to your income needs and how long you think you will live. For example, an inflation rider could make sense for an investor with expectations of a very long life. But the embedded costs of the inflation rider will result in lower initial payments. "It can take 12 to 15 years before the payment grows to what the initial amount would be without the inflation rider," says Debi Dieterich, senior annuity analyst at AnnuityAdvantage.com. If you have a long life, eventually your total payout will be greater with the inflation rider, but in the first decade or more "you lose the use of that money," Dieterich says.

Even with all the guarantees, some investors aren't willing to live within the strictures of annuities. Indeed, there's a chance they will do better: While a $200,000 investment in a group of high-quality blue-chip stocks paying 2.5% will provide income of only $5,000 in the first year, the payout may grow faster than inflation over time as companies lift their dividends. And if you look at the investment as a deferred annuity and reinvest all of the dividends for 10 or 15 years, the yield on your original investment will be significantly higher, and the principal likely will be, too.

But you take the risk of a bear market, which can be especially painful if it occurs early in your retirement. And experts say it is hard to beat the so-called mortality benefit you get from pooling your assets with other annuity investors. Quite simply, people who live long get subsidized by those who don't.

ONE OF THE MORE INTERESTING NEW PRODUCTS in the annuity industry is a form of a deferred income annuity called longevity insurance. This is geared toward folks in their 50s and 60s who are grappling with one of the most variable factors in retirement planning: how long you will live.

Longevity insurance provides a income starting late in life, say, at age 80 or 85. "The reason it's so attractive is that you have such leverage when go out that far -- 50% of the population dies between 65 and 85 -- [as] you get the money from people who died, and compounding based on a very long bond rate," says Matt Grove, vice president in charge of the annuity business at New York Life.

When used properly, annuities can remove concerns about longevity, and lower overall investment risk. This can make investors more comfortable allocating assets to riskier investments, ultimately increasing overall returns.

.E-mail: editors@barrons.com

Copyright 2011 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com

Annuities: Getting the Most Income (Morningstar)

Improving Your Finances

Four Strategies for Combating Low Annuity Yields

By Christine Benz | 12-22-11 | 06:00 AM

To help avoid outliving their assets, more retirees should defer Social Security and consider income annuities, according to a report prepared by the General Accounting Office for the U.S. Senate's Special Committee on Aging.


Yet many retirees do just the opposite, according to data presented in the report. Between 1997 and 2005, roughly 43% of Social Security-eligible individuals began taking benefits within one month of turning 62, even though waiting until their full retirement age would've translated into a substantially higher payout.


Retirees also skimp on annuities, according to the study, even though several research papers, including one from Ibbotson Associates, have demonstrated that the products can help ensure that individuals don't outlive their savings. Between 2000 and 2006, just 6% of retirees with defined-contribution plans such as 401(k) and 403(b) plans chose to move their assets into an annuity upon retirement, according to the GAO study; nearly 40% of these folks left their money in their accounts following retirement, while another one third rolled the assets over into an IRA. (The GAO's data follows participant behavior shortly after individuals retired; the report acknowledges that these same retirees may have chosen a different strategy for their retirement savings at a later time.)


Why Are People Avoiding Them?
Academics and finance professionals specializing in retirement income have conducted research into why investors are so resistant to annuities. One key impediment is pretty straightforward: loss of control. In contrast with traditional investment assets that you can alter and tap whenever you see fit, a key premise behind annuities is that you fork over a lump sum in exchange for a stream of payments throughout your life. Those payments may ultimately add up to more than you'd be able to take out of a nest egg composed of stocks, bonds, and cash, particularly if you live a long time, but the irrevocability of the decision to purchase an annuity is a key psychological barrier.


Another woefully underdiscussed reason that so few retirees opt for annuities is that payouts from plain-vanilla, single-premium immediate annuities are painfully low. In mid-2010, the difference between fixed annuity payouts and five-year certificate of deposit rates actually dipped into negative territory. Although the situation for fixed-annuity buyers has improved somewhat recently, the payouts still aren't compelling: In early 2011, fixed-annuity rates, on average, were just 0.39% higher than five-year CD rates. Of course, immediate-annuity buyers are guaranteed their income for life, even if they live to be 115. But they're also giving up control of their assets.


Annuity payouts have been depressed in part by increasing longevity: With payouts being spread over very long lives and few purchasers dying prematurely, that has the net effect of shrinking payouts for everyone in the annuity pool. (There's also some evidence that those purchasing annuities tend to be healthier with the likelihood of living longer than the general population, which could serve to depress annuity payouts further.)


Those factors are likely to be long-term headwinds for annuities. But the other factor depressing annuity payouts is apt to be more temporal: rock-bottom interest rates. For an immediate annuity, your payout will consist of just a few key elements: whatever interest rate the insurer can safely earn on your money as well as any mortality credits (the amount the insurer expects to be able to reallocate from those who die prematurely to those who survive), less the insurance company's fees. With interest rates on very safe investments barely breaking into the black, it's no wonder that annuity payouts have sunk, too.


The current rate environment argues against plowing a lot of one's assets into an immediate annuity all in one go, but that doesn't mean that investors should completely dismiss annuities (and the promise of lifetime income they provide) out of hand.


Here are four strategies for playing it smart with an immediate-annuity purchase.


1. Consider Your Need
Fixed immediate annuities will tend to make more sense for some retirees than others. Those who have a substantial share of their lifetime living expenses accounted for via pension income or Social Security will likely want to diversify into investments over which they exert a higher level of control and have the opportunity to earn a higher rate of return, such as stocks. Those who don't have a substantial source of guaranteed retirement income, meanwhile, will find greater utility from annuity products.


2. Be Patient
Although the negative effects of longevity are unlikely to go away soon, rising interest rates will eventually translate into higher annuity payouts. Don't expect substantially higher payouts right out of the box, particularly given that the still-shaky economy is apt to keep a damper on interest rates, and in turn annuity payouts, in the near term. But interest rates don't have much more room to move down, and it's worth noting that as recently as a decade ago, annuity rates were nearly double what they are today.


3. Build Your Own Ladder
One of the key attractions of sinking a lump sum into an annuity is the ability to receive a no-maintenance, pensionlike stream of income, which is particularly appealing for retirees who don't have the time or inclination to manage their portfolios on an ongoing basis. However, a slightly higher-maintenance strategy of laddering multiple annuities can help mitigate the risk of sinking a sizable share of your portfolio into an annuity at what in hindsight could turn out to be an inopportune time. If, for example, you were planning to put $200,000 into an annuity overall, you could invest $40,000 into five annuities during each of the next five years. Such a program, while not particularly simple or streamlined, would also have a beneficial side effect in that it would give you the opportunity to diversify your investments across different insurance companies, thereby offsetting the risk that an insurance company would have difficulty meeting its obligations.


4. Consider More Flexible Options
Throughout this article, I've been focusing on the simplest of annuity types--fixed-rate immediate annuities. These vehicles are typically the cheapest and most transparent in the annuity world, but they're also the most beholden to whatever interest-rate environment prevails at the time the purchaser signs the contract. It's worth noting, however, that the annuity universe includes many products with more bells and whistles, including some that address the current yield-starved climate by allowing for an interest-rate adjustment if and when interest rates head back up. Such products offer an appealing safeguard to those concerned about buying an annuity with interest rates as low as they are now, but the trade-off is that the initial payout on such an annuity would tend to be lower than the payout on an annuity without such a feature. A key rule to remember when shopping for annuities is that as you layer on safety features, such as survivor benefits and the ability to participate in higher payout rates in the future, you'll likely increase your costs and reduce your monthly payout, at least at the outset of your contract.


A version of this article appeared July 14, 2011.

The Best Annuities (Barrons)

Barron's Cover | SATURDAY, JUNE 18, 2011
Best Annuities
By KAREN HUBE

Special Report -- Retirement: With their steady income payments, annuities are suddenly hot.

Shortly after George Altmeyer of Bucks County, Pa., retired from his senior-management job at a large industrial company, half his stock portfolio vanished. It was wiped out by the stock-market crash of 2008. But Altmeyer, 67, never lost a night's sleep, and he doesn't worry about whether he will run out of retirement income. His secret? He bought two kinds of annuities in 2007. "They give this blanket of security—it doesn't matter what the stock market does, really," he says.

Annuities, maligned for years as expensive gimmicks, are now shining in a big way. The basic features that critics used to blast as too costly—downside protection and guaranteed payouts—have paid off spectacularly for folks like Altmeyer through the stock-market collapse and the subsequent volatility.

Now, as baby boomers approach retirement with fresh memories of big market losses, many sharp financial advisors are recommending an annuity as an important part of an income plan. "We've come from thinking that stocks and bonds were the answer to everything, to worrying about how to arrange for monthly income to age 80 and beyond," says Fred Reish, a lawyer who specializes in retirement issues at Drinker Biddle & Reath in Los Angeles. "Annuities can take away that worry."


Little wonder that annuities are getting a fresh look. Though the effective returns are hardly eye-popping—often just a shade above those of certificates of deposit—annuities offer some real comfort to retirees.

With that in mind, Barron's has identified what we think are the 25 best annuities. As you can see in the table nearby, we've picked five annuities from each of five categories. We sized up the field mostly by returns, costs and strength of the insurance companies behind the products. As of last week, each of the annuities on our list was doing well by all three measures.

IN ITS MOST basic form, an annuity is a contract with an insurance company that converts your lump sum into a stream of guaranteed income, for either a set period or for your lifetime. Its primary purpose is to hedge against longevity risk—the risk that you outlive your income. While annuities date back centuries, longevity risk is a growing modern concern. Consider: In 1930, retirement lasted three to seven years, with people dying at an average age of 60. As life expectancies grew longer over subsequent years, most workers could depend on a company pension to carry them through retirement.

Now, retirements last a quarter century or more, and pensions are a dying breed, so investors are left to their own devices to arrange for income to supplement Social Security payments. At age 65, the average life expectancy is 85 for a man and 88 for a woman. But what haunts folks planning for retirement are the odds of living much longer. There's a 25% chance of living past 90, and for a couple, there's a 25% chance that one spouse will live to age 95.

While that is a risk annuities can address, they traditionally have introduced other problems in the process. The biggest: Once you hand over a lump sum, you could never get the money back, and if you died prematurely, the insurance company, rather than your heirs, got what was left of your money.

But over the past decade, insurers have become much more flexible, offering long menus of riders and options to give investors liquidity, exit opportunities and certainty that their heirs are first in line for the assets, not the insurer.

The number of different annuities has mushroomed: There are now 1,600 iterations of the product. These include both variable annuities, whose growth fluctuates based on underlying stock and bond investments, and fixed annuities, which are pegged to an interest rate, similar to a certificate of deposit or a bond. The payouts can be either immediate—starting right now—or deferred, starting at a specified later date.

The most popular of all is the deferred variable annuity, the last of the five categories shown on our list. It accounted for 63% of the annuity industry's $221 billion in sales last year, with investors choosing from a range of underlying stock- and bond-fund investment options. Money in these products grows tax-deferred, an advantage over a mutual fund. On the date you specify, the value is "annuitized," or turned into steady payouts. The better the underlying investments have done, the higher the payouts. The payouts are taxed as ordinary income.

In a plain-vanilla deferred variable annuity, negative returns are possible, but the industry has created various options to put investors at ease, such as riders that guarantee certain levels of income upon retirement. "Eighty percent of the time people buy an income rider," says Robert E. Sollmann, executive vice president of retirement products at MetLife.

Also popular are guaranteed minimum death benefits. Almost all deferred variable annuities sold include the basic kind: a guarantee that, if the account value has lost value when the investor dies, heirs will get the full amount initially invested. Death benefits can get a lot fancier, such as guarantees that heirs get the highest value the account hit on one of its anniversaries. Between 2001 and 2003, variable annuity beneficiaries received $2.8 billion more than the account value when policy holders died earlier than expected, according to the Insured Retirement Institute.


Despite the popularity of deferred variable annuities, they aren't necessarily the best choice, financial advisors caution. Many are sold aggressively by sales agents to folks who only vaguely understand the costs and features. In fact, the fee structure can encourage unscrupulous practices.

Average fees on variable annuities are 2.33%, compared with mutual funds' 1.32%, but they can top 4%, including death-benefit fees, administrative fees and underlying mutual fund expenses.

Michael Zhuang, an advisor at MZ Capital in Washington, D.C., said an investor recently asked him to look over his variable annuity contract. "The investor thought he was paying 2% in expenses, but it was double that, " Zhuang says. "His contract was about 100 pages. Various expenses were on different pages."

However, it's entirely possible to find a lower-cost variable annuity, such as those offered by Vanguard, Fidelity, Charles Schwab or Pacific Life Insurance Co., among others, advisors say. And for investors who have maxed out contributions to a 401(k), IRA or other tax-favored savings plans, a variable deferred annuity could make sense, some advisors say.

THE PUREST OF ALL annuity products—favored most widely by advisors—is an immediate annuity. You give the insurance company a chunk of money, and it converts it right away into fixed regular payments for life or a specified period.

Some economists say they are baffled by the low level of participation in these products, given their benefits. Aside from guaranteed income, lifetime annuities actually give retirees higher regular payments than they would get if they self-managed their income stream. "Annuities provide what we economists call a mortality premium, which is basically an extra rate of return over and above what one can get from a non-annuitized asset," says Jeffrey R. Brown, a finance professor at the University of Illinois and associate director of the National Bureau of Economic Research's Center for Retirement Research.

With a basic lifetime immediate annuity, you give up assets to the insurance company if you die early. "If you live long, you win but if you don't, you lose. But you're dead," says Jean Fullerton, an advisor at WJM Financial in Bedford, N.H. But many insurers, such as New York Life and Aviva, offer guarantees that they will continue to pay the annuity for five to 25 years. If you die within this period, the payments go to your heirs.

Special features always cost extra, and with immediate annuities, the costs take the form of lower monthly payouts. For example, a 65-year-old man who puts $100,000 into an immediate annuity with lifetime payment at Pacific Life Insurance Co. would get a monthly lifetime payout of $602, according to Cannex, which tracks annuity data. If he opted for a 10-year guarantee, meaning the insurer continues to pay heirs for 10 years even if he dies before that, the monthly payment would be $590.

Rosemary Caligiuri, a financial advisor at Harvest Group Financial Services, says she likes to use immediate annuities in combination with fixed deferred annuities for her clients in retirement. In a fixed deferred annuity, assets are paid out later and grow based on underlying interest rates. The rates can be reset based on insurers' underlying investments. Or, investors can choose a fixed rate for a certain period.

You might also consider index-linked annuities, says Caligiuri, who ladders annuities to secure income in phases and diversify across insurers. These cushion the downside—you'll never have a return below zero, even in a year like 2008. On the upside, returns on these are pegged to an index, but are usually capped.

Jack Marrion, president of Advantage Compendium, which tracks indexed annuities, says over many historical periods they have proven to be better choices than either CDs or the stock market. Over the past five years through September 2010, 36 annuities offered by 19 insurers had an average annual return of 3.9%, compared with a one-year CD's 2.8%, a five-year CD's 3.8% and the S&P 500 index's return of 0.65%, according to a study by Marrion.

Periodically, usually each year, an insurer can reset its caps or other terms. "If a company won't give you its renewal history, don't do business with them," he says. Also consider the financial-strength ratings by A.M. Best, Standard & Poor's and other agencies.

If you choose wisely, you'll end up with a nice income flow, relatively low fees and minimal risk of problems with the provider. That's saying a lot in these uncertain times.

.E-mail: editors@barrons.com

Copyright 2011 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.